Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10875907rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0153633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10875907lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005854lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10875907lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1883709lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:dateCreated2000-8-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:abstractText(99m)Tc-Sestamibi (MIBI) has been successfully applied in recurrent glioblastoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incremental diagnostic information of MIBI as a tumor-avid radiopharmaceutical compared with (99m)Tc-pertechnetate ((99m)Tc) as sole indicator of the integrity of the blood-brain barrier. Twenty-five patients with confirmed recurrent brain tumors were included. MIBI SPET was performed 10 min after injection of 555 MBq MIBI intravenously with a triple-headed gamma camera equipped with LE-UHR-PAR collimators over 360 degrees (3 degrees /step) and stored in a 128(2) matrix. Identical acquisition parameters were used for (99m)Tc SPET, which was acquired 3 h after injection of 740 MBq (99m)Tc. Normalized tumor uptake (NU) was calculated from attenuation-corrected transaxial slices. In addition, tumor/plexus, tumor/nasopharynx, and tumor/parotid gland ratios were assessed in both studies. No statistically significant differences were detected for the mean NU of tumor tissue with MIBI (0.26 +/- 0.10) and (99m)Tc (0.39 +/- 0. 33) and for the tumor/nasopharynx and tumor/parotid gland ratios; only the tumor/plexus ratio was significantly higher for (99m)Tc than for MIBI (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our data indicate that MIBI scintigraphy in brain tumors at 10 min postinjection reveals no additional visual information over that provided by the conventional (99m)Tc-pertechnetate brain scan, and in addition, tracer retention reflects primarily blood-brain barrier damage.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:issn1053-8119lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoffmannMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PuiuAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarosiCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeithaTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KillenAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FazenyBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StaudenherzAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NaselCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2000 Academic Press.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:volume12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:pagination109-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10875907...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:articleTitleDoes (99m)Tc-Sestamibi in high-grade malignant brain tumors reflect blood-brain barrier damage only?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Vienna-AKH, Waehringer-Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10875907pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed