Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10737959rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003069lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10737959lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026882lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10737959lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510438lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10737959lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:dateCreated2000-4-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:abstractTextTransgenic rodent gene mutation models provide quick and statistically reliable assays for mutations in the DNA from any tissue. For regulatory applications, assays should be based on neutral genes, be generally available in several laboratories, and be readily transferable. Five or fewer repeated treatments are inadequate to conclude that a compound is negative but more than 90 daily treatments may risk complications. A sampling time of 35 days is suitable for most tissues and chemicals, while shorter sampling times might be appropriate for highly proliferative tissues. For phage-based assays, 5 to 10 animals per group should be analyzed, assuming a spontaneous mutant frequency (MF) of approximately 3 x 10(-5) mutants/locus and 125,000-300,000 plaque or colony forming units (PFU or CFU) per tissue. Data should be generated for two dose groups but three should be treated, at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), two-thirds the MTD, and one-third the MTD. Concurrent positive control animals are only necessary during validation, but positive control DNA must be included in each plating. Tissues should be processed and analyzed in a block design and the total number of PFUs or CFUs and the MF for each tissue and animal reported. Sequencing data would not normally be required but might provide useful additional information in specific circumstances. Statistical tests used should consider the animal as the experimental unit. Nonparametric statistical tests are recommended. A positive result is a statistically significant dose-response and/or statistically significant increase in any dose group compared to concurrent negative controls using an appropriate statistical model. A negative result is statistically nonsignificant with all mean MF within two standard deviations of the control.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:issn0893-6692lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeddleJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DeanSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NohmiTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DouglasG RGRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SkopekT RTRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GlickmanB WBWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThybaudVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TindallK RKRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YajimaNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MirsalisJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GorelickN JNJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CascianoDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartusH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoerrigterMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:volume35lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:pagination253-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:dateRevised2003-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10737959...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:year2000lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:articleTitleIn vivo transgenic mutation assays.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada. jheddle@yorku.calld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10737959pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10737959lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10737959lld:pubmed