| pubmed-article:10565700 | pubmed:abstractText | The cost-effectiveness of amiodarone prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was determined. A decision analysis using current hospital data and values from the literature was conducted. Under the base-case scenario, CABG patients received usual care (no prophylaxis) or 2 g of oral amiodarone hydrochloride over one to three days before surgery and 400 mg daily for seven days after surgery. Costs of hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the cardiac step-down unit (SDU), cardioversion costs, electrocardiogram costs, drug costs, nursing administration charges, and pharmacy i.v. admixture charges were included. A sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation and a one-way sensitivity analysis were performed. The mean cost per AF event avoided was lower in the amiodarone group ($15,750, 95% confidence interval [CI]: $15,591-$15,999) than the control group ($17,426,95% CI: $17,252-$17,600). A majority of the cost difference was due to the cost of hospitalization for patients without AF, the frequency of AF, and the cost of hospitalization in the SDU for patients with AF. For patients treated with amiodarone who did not develop AF, the cost difference was sensitive to changes in the cost of hospitalization and the efficacy of amiodarone. For patients who did develop AF, the cost difference was robust. Prophylaxis of AF with amiodarone in CABG patients was more cost-effective than usual care in the short term from a hospital perspective; the results were sensitive to changes in the cost of hospitalization of patients who did not develop AF and the efficacy of amiodarone. | lld:pubmed |
