Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10544875rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0221912lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10544875lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677043lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10544875lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001721lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10544875lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010401lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10544875lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677862lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:dateCreated1999-11-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:abstractTextLocalized freezing of skin lesions in situ is widely used by dermatologists to provide anesthesia prior to excision or curettage. To determine whether this technique adversely affects the interpretation of biopsy specimens, we compared the histopathologic features of frozen and unfrozen portions of nine skin lesions, eight seborrheic keratoses, and one basal cell carcinoma. We detected no differences in the histopathologic features between the frozen and unfrozen portions of the lesions. We conclude that the technique of cutaneous cryoanesthesia does not adversely affect the histopathologic evaluation of skin lesions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:issn0011-4162lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LongleyB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LuckLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:volume64lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:pagination225-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10544875...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:articleTitleCutaneous cryoanesthesia does not affect histopathology of biopsy specimens.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10544875pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed