Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10527991rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013935lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015914lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0152150lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243161lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0455164lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708528lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0206034lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:dateCreated1999-11-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:abstractTextA prospective randomized study comparing single embryo transfer with double embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) was carried out. First, top quality embryo characteristics were delineated by retrospectively analysing embryos resulting in ongoing twins after double embryo transfer. A top quality embryo was characterized by the presence of 4 or 5 blastomeres at day 2 and at least 7 blastomeres on day 3 after insemination, the absence of multinucleated blastomeres and <20% cellular fragments on day 2 and day 3 after fertilization. Using these criteria, a prospective study was conducted in women <34 years of age, who started their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Of 194 eligible patients, 110 agreed to participate of whom 53 produced at least two top quality embryos and were prospectively randomized. In all, 26 single embryo transfers resulted in 17 conceptions, 14 clinical and 10 ongoing pregnancies [implantation rate (IR) = 42.3%; ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) = 38.5%] with one monozygotic twin; 27 double embryo transfers resulted in 20 ongoing conceptions with six (30%) twins (IR = 48.1%; OPR = 74%). We conclude that by using single embryo transfer and strict embryo criteria, an OPR similar to that in normal fertile couples can be achieved after IVF/ICSI, while limiting the dizygotic twin pregnancy rate to its natural incidence of <1% of all ongoing pregnancies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:issn0268-1161lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GerrisJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van RoyenEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MangelschotsK...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ValkenburgMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van de...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorpubmed-author:De NeubourgDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:pagination2581-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10527991...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:articleTitlePrevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:affiliationFertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology-Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020, Antwerp, Belgium.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10527991pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10527991lld:pubmed