Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10519298rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1306645lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552617lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282443lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332306lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:dateCreated1999-10-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:abstractTextGood quality radiographs are essential for making accurate diagnoses. Many factors influence the quality of radiographs including the x-ray machine specifications and settings, the darkroom environment and processing, and the choice of ancillary x-ray equipment (cassette properties, film/screen selection, use and properties of a grid). In compiling a technique chart, many of these variables are standardized so as to provide dependable guidelines for selecting the appropriate exposure settings (mAs and kVp) for a radiographic study. The systematic evaluation of image blackening, peripheral blackening, and the visibility of the gross image detail and contrast will facilitate the development of a technique chart as well as determining the source of the problem and necessary exposure setting changes for radiographs that are suboptimal. A flow diagram is described that will assist with the systematic evaluation of radiographic quality and provide guidelines for correcting exposure errors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:issn1058-8183lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KirbergerR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:volume40lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:pagination220-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10519298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10519298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10519298...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:articleTitleRadiograph quality evaluation for exposure variables--a review.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Onderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10519298pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed