Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10496439rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013516lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034604lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242698lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2698872lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026565lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:dateCreated1999-9-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:abstractTextLeft ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, as indicated by a reduced LV ejection fraction (EF) is a potent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Radionuclide angiography accurately and reproducibly assesses LVEF; however, echocardiography is used more frequently in clinical practice. Whether these methods predict similar mortality has not been fully investigated. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with baseline radionuclide angiographic (RNA; n = 4,330) and echocardiographic (echo; n = 1,376) based EFs < or =0.35 who were enrolled in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) to address this hypothesis. After adjusting for important prognostic variables, the risk of death (RR 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.30; p = 0.03) and of cardiovascular death (RR 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.32; p = 0.04) was higher for patients with ECG-based EFs. To compare the 2 techniques across a range of EF values, we divided the cohort into tertiles of EF. The adjusted risk estimates for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were similar within each tertile. Of note, the mortality difference in patients with echo- versus RNA-based EFs was most prominent in women. Further, patients with echo-based EFs had significantly higher mortality at sites where this technique was less frequently used to assess the EF. Thus, for a given EF < or =0.35, an echo-based value was associated with a higher risk of death compared with the RNA-based method of measurement. These data suggest that EF values determined by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography predict different mortality and this may, in part, be related to technical proficiency as well as patient characteristics.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CooperH AHAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MirskyIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RashidHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WaclawiwM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DomanskiM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ExnerD VDVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:volume84lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:pagination299-303lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10496439...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:articleTitleComparison of echocardiography and radionuclide angiography as predictors of mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (studies of left ventricular dysfunction).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:affiliationClinical Trials Research Group and Office of Biostatistics Research, Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. RashidH@gwgate.nhlbi.nih.govlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10496439pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10496439lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10496439lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10496439lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10496439lld:pubmed