Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10459486rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025885lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1264818lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162867lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204727lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521725lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:dateCreated1999-10-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:abstractTextTwo selective media for the isolation of Campylobacter species, a blood containing medium (CampyBAP) and blood-free, charcoal based formulation (CCDA) were compared for the ability to isolate Campylobacter species during a 1-year period. Of the 1,132 stool samples cultured during the study, 42 Campylobacter species were recovered using both media (3.7% yield). CCDA was better than CampyBAP for isolating C. jejuni subsp jejuni (18/20 vs 8/20, P = 0.002) and for all isolates, CCDA was superior over CampyBAP (39/42 vs 13/42, P < 0.0001). Overall, CCDA is a superior medium compared with CampyBAP for isolating Campylobacter species in our study population.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:issn0732-8893lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NachamkinIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Garcia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Arzate...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Ponce NavaEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:pagination329-32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10459486...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:articleTitleComparison of two selective media for the isolation of Campylobacter species from a pediatric population in Mexico.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:affiliationLaboratorio de Bacteriologia, Instituto Nacional de Pediatria, Mexico City, Mexico.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10459486pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed