Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10414896rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242231lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0554756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009609lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1533691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681836lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0870071lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005978lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:dateCreated1999-9-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:abstractTextThe present study evaluates the use of intracoronary velocity measurements by Doppler guidewires for assessing coronary obstructions. In vitro experiments were performed in a flow model using acrylic phantoms of coronary stenoses with different configurations (stenosis area: 56%, 75% and 89%; stenosis length: 1 and 5 mm; stenosis border: tapering or abrupt). Nonpulsatile laminar flow conditions of a test fluid were established at flow rates ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mL/s to simulate baseline flow and flow after vasodilation. Peak Doppler velocity was measured proximal to, within and distal to the model stenoses. Computer simulations were employed to calculate radial flow profiles with and without a Doppler wire aligned with the vessel center. In 84 in vitro flow experiments, peak Doppler velocity correlated well with the average flow velocity as calculated from the actual flow rate and the vessel's cross-sectional area proximal to (r = 0.98, SEE = 1.4, p < 0.001) and within (r = 0.97, SEE = 16.4, p < 0.001) the stenosis. However, the ratio of calculated average velocity to Doppler-measured peak velocity was significantly different from 0.5, the expected value for a parabolic flow profile (0.76+/-0.08, 0.81+/-0.14; p < 0.001). Acceptable accuracy was found for the Doppler estimation of stenosis severity using the continuity equation (error: 0.9+/-1.2% and -4.6+/-3.5% for stenosis with a length of 5 mm and 1 mm, respectively). Doppler velocity reserve significantly underestimated the true flow reserve for the 56% and 75% stenoses (p < 0.01). Computer simulations demonstrated significant alterations of flow profiles by the wire, which explained the observed underestimation of the true flow reserve by the Doppler velocity reserve. Thus, Doppler guidewire measurements of intracoronary flow velocities are useful to assess the severity of coronary stenoses. However, the in vitro results and computer simulations indicate that guidewires alter the flow profile, so that Doppler velocity reserve may underestimate the true flow reserve.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:issn0301-5629lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ProbstPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaurerGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BaumgartnerHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PorentaGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchimaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TsangarisSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoertlDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PentarisAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:volume25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:pagination793-801lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10414896...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:articleTitleAssessment of coronary stenoses by Doppler wires: a validation study using in vitro modeling and computer simulations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:affiliationLudwig Boltzmann Research Institute for Cardiac Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria. gporenta@pop3.kard.akh-wien.ac.atlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10414896pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed