Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10335931rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003232lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015967lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516213lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442027lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332189lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1518896lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880496lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:dateCreated1999-6-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:abstractTextHospitalization and empirical broad-spectrum, intravenous antibiotics are the standard treatment for febrile cancer patients. Recent evidence supports the suggestion that febrile episodes in a low-risk population can be managed successfully in an outpatient setting, but the optimal drug regimen is unknown. In a prospective randomized clinical trial we compared ciprofloxacin 750 mg p.o. twice a day with ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. as a single daily dose for the empiric domiciliary treatment of febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic and nonneutropenic cancer patients. A total of 173 patients, accounting for 183 febrile episodes, were enrolled in the study. Overall, successful outcomes were recorded for 76 of 93 (82%) febrile episodes in patients who were randomized to the oral regimen and for 68 of 90 (75%) febrile episodes in patients randomized to the i.v. regimen: this difference was not statistically significant. The success rate was similar in all subgroups of patients: neutropenic and nonneutropenic, with documented infection and with fever of unknown origin. There were 3 deaths in the group of patients treated with the parenteral regimen, and two of these were related to treatment failure. Both treatments were well tolerated, and the cost of the oral regimen was lower. This prospective study suggests that domiciliary antibiotic empiric monotherapy is feasible in febrile nonneutropenic or low-risk neutropenic outpatients in whom a bacterial infection is suspected, and that either an oral or a parenteral regimen can be used. A number of factors may influence the choice between an orally and an i.v.-administered antibiotic, but owing to the easier administration and lower cost, the oral regimen seems to be preferable.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:issn0941-4355lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Del FaveroAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MenichettiFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GentileGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinoPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarbabietolaG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MicozziAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LandonioGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IoriA PAPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MinottiVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BucaneveGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CavicchiFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:volume7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:pagination134-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10335931...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:articleTitleDomiciliary treatment of febrile episodes in cancer patients: a prospective randomized trial comparing oral versus parenteral empirical antibiotic treatment.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:affiliationDivision of Medical Oncology, Policlinico, Perugia, Italy. oncmedpg@krenet.itlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10335931pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed