Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10330677rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1123023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043047lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010029lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162344lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037392lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1839839lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011121lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0071666lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:dateCreated1999-6-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:abstractTextIn the home and workplace, decontamination of a chemical from skin is traditionally done with a soap-and-water wash, although some workplaces may have emergency showers. It has been assumed that these procedures are effective, yet workplace illness and even death occur from chemical contamination. Water, or soap and water, may not be the most effective means of skin decontamination, particularly for fat-soluble materials. This study was undertaken to help determine whether there are more effective means of removing methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI), a potent contact sensitizer, from the skin. MDI is an industrial chemical for which skin decontamination, using traditional soap and water and nontraditional polypropylene glycol, a polyglycol-based cleanser (PG-C), and corn oil were all tried in vivo on the rhesus monkey, over 8 h. Water, alone and with soap (5% and 50% soap), were partially effective in the first h after exposure, removing 51-69% of the applied dose. However, decontamination fell to 40-52% at 4 h and 29-46% by 8 h. Thus, the majority of MDI was not removed by the traditional soap-and-water wash; skin tape stripping after washing confirmed that MDI was still on the skin. In contrast, polypropylene glycol, PG-C, and corn oil all removed 68-86% of the MDI in the first h, 74-79% at 4 h, and 72-86% at 8 h. Statistically, polypropylene glycol, PG-C, and corn oil were all better (p < 0.05) than soap and water at 4 and 8 h after dose application. These results indicate that a traditional soap-and-water wash and the emergency water shower are relatively ineffective at removing MDI from the skin. More effective decontamination procedures, as shown here, are available. These procedures are consistent with the partial miscibility of MDI in corn oil and polyglycols.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:issn1096-6080lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LandryTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaibachH IHIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WesterR CRClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuiXXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:volume48lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:pagination1-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10330677...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:articleTitleIn vivo skin decontamination of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI): soap and water ineffective compared to polypropylene glycol, polyglycol-based cleanser, and corn oil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0989, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10330677pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10330677lld:pubmed