Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10155676rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003308lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005961lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521367lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442027lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016277lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032473lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0199176lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010186lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220812lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085795lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:dateCreated1996-1-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:abstractTextWe used a costs model to compare alternative modes of prophylaxis against oropharyngeal fungal infections in patients with leukaemia or myeloma who had undergone bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We compared 2 innovative pharmaceutical options (oral fluconazole and intravenous liposomal amphotericin) with existing standard practice (oral polyenes). Costs were measured over a 12-week treatment period, and were compared with the 2 effectiveness measures: (i) the avoidance of colonisation or infection; and (ii) the patients' ability to continue with prophylaxis in an uninfected state. The costs and effectiveness of BMT itself were not considered in this evaluation. The costs per successfully treated patient over a 12-week period were 28,956 pounds (1 pound = $US1.60, June 1995) for oral fluconazole, 53,225 pounds for liposomal amphotericin and 32,768 pounds for oral polyenes. Sensitivity analysis showed that the costs of liposomal amphotericin always exceeded those of the oral comparators, reflecting its high acquisition, preparation and administration costs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:citationSubsetTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:issn1170-7690lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MehtaJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PowlesRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StewartAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RichardsonCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HewetsonMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AnsariZ AZAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:volume8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:pagination350-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10155676...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:articleTitleCosts of antifungal prophylaxis after bone marrow transplantation. A model comparing oral fluconazole, liposomal amphotericin and oral polyenes as prophylaxis against oropharyngeal infections.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:affiliationPersonal Social Services Research Unit/Canterbury Business School, University of Kent at Canterbury, England.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10155676pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10155676lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10155676lld:pubmed