Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10086602rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10086602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521324lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10086602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034595lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10086602lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1546466lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:dateCreated1999-4-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:abstractTextThere are fundamental problems with the calculation of radiation doses to the skeleton from internal emitters deposited in bone. Some of these include dose inhomogeneities, identity of cells at risk and their dynamics, changing deposition patterns of bone-seeking radionuclides with time after exposure, seemingly unique responses of the skeleton to each deposited radionuclide, the role of radioactive progeny produced by deposited emitters and their individual dynamics and effects, different responses of mammals of different ages at exposure to identical dosages, different responses to different chemical forms of a given radionuclide, and different responses to an identical dose from a given radionuclide at different dose-rates. This situation makes it necessary to choose some common dose parameter that will allow the overall effects of different radionuclides to be compared directly so that projected effects of each of them in humans can be estimated. For radiation protection purposes, it appears premature to abandon the concept of average skeletal dose (which appears to be a practical compromise for use) until an undelusive, non-artificial and uncontrived method of calculating absorbed dose to the appropriate cells in bone is developed that fulfills the requirement of equal cancer response for equal skeletal dose for all circumstances.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:issn0017-9078lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FisherD RDRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LloydR DRDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MillerS CSClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchlenkerR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:volume76lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:pagination402-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10086602...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:articleTitleSome problems in the skeletal dosimetry of bone-seeking radionuclides.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:affiliationUniversity of Utah, Department of Radiology, Salt Lake City 84112-5860, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10086602pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10086602lld:pubmed