Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0008653,
umls-concept:C0012854,
umls-concept:C0036667,
umls-concept:C0043240,
umls-concept:C0208973,
umls-concept:C0242606,
umls-concept:C0312418,
umls-concept:C0374711,
umls-concept:C0678226,
umls-concept:C1517892,
umls-concept:C1704666,
umls-concept:C1705181,
umls-concept:C1705241,
umls-concept:C1705242,
umls-concept:C1979975
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-11-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Defects in loci on chromosome 11 have been associated with tumourigenicity, anchorage-independent growth, metastasis and radiosensitive DNA repair in tumour cells. The introduction of normal chromosome 11 into these cells suppresses these responses. In the present study we tested two hypotheses: (1) that microcell fusion of normal chromosome 11 into bladder-carcinoma cells (A1698) can protect the cells against chromosomal damage by oxidative stress; and (2) that insertion of normal chromosome 11 corrects a single-strand (SS) DNA-repair defect. Cultures of A1698 (termed parent) and its microcell-mediated hybrid (termed hybrid) were exposed for 1 h to xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO) or co-incubated with human neutrophils activated with 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Micronucleus frequencies (an indication of chromosomal damage) were significantly higher in parent cultures after treatment than in hybrid (P < 0.0001). The level of single-strand DNA breakage and its repair was assayed in X/XO-treated cultures with the alkaline comet assay. There was no significant difference between parent and hybrid in the amount of SS DNA breakage at treatment (P > 0.1) or after 20 min of repair (P > 0.1). The data support the involvement of a defect in chromosome 11 leading to sensitivity to oxidative stress and suggest this defect is not in the initial amount or rate of rejoining of SS DNA breakage.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0027-5107
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
294
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
299-308
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Cell Line,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-DNA Damage,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-DNA Repair,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Keratinocytes,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Micronucleus Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Neutrophils,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Oxidation-Reduction,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Tumor Cells, Cultured,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Xanthine,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Xanthine Oxidase,
pubmed-meshheading:7692269-Xanthines
|
pubmed:year |
1993
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A sensitivity to oxidative stress is linked to chromosome 11 but is not due to a difference in single strand DNA breakage or repair.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|