Linked Life Data

6630773

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/6630773

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1983-12-17
pubmed:abstractText
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a tongue-epigastric defibrillation route in anesthetized dogs. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by rectangular pulses passed down a transvenous catheter into the right ventricle. Three groups of dogs were studied. Group I (15 dogs) received shocks from a 12 cm2 tongue electrode, a 50 cm2 circular, gelled self-adhesive electrode pad placed on the epigastrium and standard transthoracic defibrillator paddle electrodes. Shocks were given at energy levels of 50 to 460 joules (delivered energy, 50 ohm resistance). The success of the tongue-epigastric shocks in achieving defibrillation, and the resistance and current flow were determined at each energy level and compared with the same energy shocks from the standard transthoracic electrodes. In Group II (five dogs), comparisons were made between the 12 cm2 tongue electrode used in the first group of dogs and a larger tongue electrode of 40 cm2. In Group III (five dogs), intracardiac current flow (potential gradient) with tongue-epigastric and standard transthoracic electrodes was studied. In Group I, defibrillation success with the tongue-epigastric electrodes ranged from no success at 50 to 100 joules to 83% success at 460 joules. With standard transthoracic electrodes, success rates ranged from 65% at 50 joules to 100% at 300 joules. At all energies tested, the resistance was significantly higher and current significantly lower using tongue-epigastric compared with transthoracic electrodes. The higher tongue-epigastric resistance is probably related to the longer interelectrode distance; the correlation between interelectrode distance (x, in centimeters) and resistance (y, in ohms) in these dogs was y = 2.2x + 29.6, r = 0.78.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0735-1097
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
966-72
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1983
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway--the tongue-epigastric route. I. Experimental studies in dogs.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't