Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3955784rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007131lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008838lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010583lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013089lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015133lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023972lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025677lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0065473lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205179lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:dateCreated1986-5-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:abstractTextFrom June, 1982 to December, 1984, 35 consecutive patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated either with methotrexate, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide and CCNU (MACC regimen) or cis-platinum and etoposide (DDP-VP16). The rates of objective responses were, respectively, 15% (3 partial responses out of 20 patients) and 13 (2 out of 15). Times to progression were significantly prolonged in the DDP-VP16 group (median: 29 weeks vs 11), with a trend to improvement in the median survival time (30 weeks vs. 17, P less than 0.1). Except for life-threatening leukopenia in 15% of the MACC patients and intractable vomiting in 47% of patients on cis-platinum based chemotherapy, no serious toxicity was observed. The DDP-VP16 combination seems to be more effective, but less well tolerated, than the MACC regimen and can be recommended for compliant patients with good prognostic factors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:issn0392-906Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VolkPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CurcioAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MattaliaEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BuccheriGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FerrignoDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:volume5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:pagination53-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3955784-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:year1986lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:articleTitleMACC (methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and lomustine) versus cis-platinum and etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3955784pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed