Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
23
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-2-15
pubmed:abstractText
This paper presents an alternative view to a commonly held misconception. The extent to which the causes of human cancer can be known is less than generally believed on the basis of the formal summation of estimates on the causal role of certain carcinogenic factors that have been tabulated by Doll and Peto (1981). Here it is stressed that the factors with known causal relation in the etiology have not as yet been ascertained for up to 97% of human cancers. Currently only one-third of the cancer deaths registered in the Federal Republic of Germany can be assigned etiologically to known exogenous carcinogenic agents or lifestyle. Accordingly, the causes of less than 50% of all malignant neoplasms are known and amenable to direct causal primary prevention. This, however, does not preclude a concept of "indirect primary prevention" which, based on the probable summation of subcarcinogenic effects of single carcinogens, enables removal from the environment of compounds that show carcinogenicity in animals, even if these compounds lack epidemiological evidence of carcinogenic activity.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0023-2173
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
4
pubmed:volume
67
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1169-73
pubmed:dateRevised
2005-11-16
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1989
pubmed:articleTitle
Causes of cancer--an alternative view to Doll and Peto (1981).
pubmed:affiliation
Institut für Toxikologie und Chemotherapie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review