Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/20689048
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-8-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To challenge the findings of Pollard, Ellis, Finan, and Ramig (2009), who examined 11 participants using the SpeechEasy, an in-the-ear device that employs altered auditory feedback to reduce stuttering, in a 6-month "clinical trial." Pollard et al. failed to demonstrate a significant treatment effect on stuttering frequency, yet found positive subjective self-report data across four months of use. The authors concluded that the device was not therapeutically useful and further testing is unwarranted.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
1558-9102
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
53
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
908-11; author reply 912-6
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2010
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Refutation of a therapeutic alternative? A reply to Pollard, Ellis, Finan, and Ramig (2009).
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Letter,
Comment,
Evaluation Studies
|