Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16210311rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008059lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162645lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439658lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:dateCreated2005-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:abstractTextWe tested the hypothesis that ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fibreoptic position, gastric insufflation, and the frequency of mucosal trauma differ between the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) and the classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA) in anaesthetized children. For the PLMA, we also assessed the ease of gastric tube placement via the PLMA drain tube and measure residual gastric volume.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:issn0007-0912lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GarciaGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrimacombeJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Lopez-GilMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:volume95lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:pagination827-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16210311...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:articleTitleA randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Reanimation, Maranon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16210311pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed