rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2005-7-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Repeat infective endocarditis due to the same species can represent relapse of the initial infection or a new infection. We used time-based clinical criteria and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-based molecular criteria to classify 13 cases of repeat infective endocarditis as either relapse or reinfection. The agreement between clinical and molecular criteria was imperfect (agreement in 10 [77%] of 13 cases).
|
pubmed:grant |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
1537-6591
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
pubmed:volume |
41
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
406-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2005
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Repeat infective endocarditis: differentiating relapse from reinfection.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. chu00009@mc.duke.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|