Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15385363rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15385363lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023660lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15385363lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033487lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15385363lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002913lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:dateCreated2004-9-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:abstractTextPropofol is sometimes used in combination with epidural anesthesia with lidocaine. In this study, we investigated the effect of propofol on the plasma concentration of lidocaine and its principal metabolites during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to receive either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia (n = 16 each). In the propofol group, anesthesia was maintained with a target concentration of propofol of 4 microg/mL. In the sevoflurane group, anesthesia was maintained with 1.5% sevoflurane. Lidocaine was administered epidurally in an initial dose of 5 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion at 2.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Free components of plasma lidocaine and its metabolites-monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX)-were measured 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after the initiation of continuous epidural injection by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Free lidocaine, MEGX, and GX were separated from 2 mL of plasma by ultrafiltration filter units. Hemodynamic data were similar between groups. The plasma concentrations of free lidocaine were not significantly different between groups. The ratios of free MEGX to free lidocaine and free GX to free MEGX were not different between groups. In conclusion, propofol does not alter the metabolism of epidural lidocaine compared with sevoflurane.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:issn0003-2999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MiyabeMasayuk...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FukudaTaekoTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ToyookaHideno...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KohdaYukinaoYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:InomataShinic...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NakayamaShinSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OsakaYoshikoYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KakiuchiYoshi...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:volume99lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:pagination1131-5, table of contentslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15385363...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:year2004lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:articleTitlePropofol does not inhibit lidocaine metabolism during epidural anesthesia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15385363pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed