Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15096934
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-4-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Management of recurrent soft tissue sarcomas often involves surgical resection and adjuvant brachytherapy. This study reviews our experience in the management of these patients and proposes a logical approach toward reconstruction. All patients who underwent soft tissue sarcoma resection, adjuvant brachytherapy, and soft tissue flap reconstruction (pedicled or free) during the 10-year period from 1991 to 2000 were included in this study. There were 17 patients (14 male, 3 female) with a mean age of 51 years (range, 16-80 years). Soft tissue sarcomas were distributed in the lower extremity (n = 9), upper extremity (n = 5), and trunk (n = 3). Reconstruction was accomplished by regional transposition flaps (n = 10) and free tissue transfer (n = 7). The average defect size was 143 cm. Patients received 5 to 12 (mean, 8) brachytherapy catheters. The brachytherapy dose delivered ranged from 1600 to 4500 cGy (mean, 3773 cGy). Brachytherapy catheters were loaded with radioactive sources between 5 and 7 days postoperatively. All flaps in this series survived. One patient required return to the operating room for revision of a venous thrombosis with flap salvage. Closed suction drainage tubes were left in place until after the brachytherapy catheters were removed to avoid dislodging the catheters. Two patients developed postradiation partial-thickness skin necrosis with delayed secondary wound healing. This study demonstrates that soft tissue reconstruction in the setting of sarcoma resection and brachytherapy catheter placement is safe and efficacious. Postoperative wound healing complications can be minimized through coordination among the ablative surgeon, reconstructive surgeon, and radiation oncologist. Specifically, placement of microvascular anastomoses well away from the radiation target area is indicated whenever possible. Finally, removal of closed suction drainage tubes should be deferred until after the brachytherapy catheters are removed to minimize complications resulting from catheter dislodgement.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
0148-7043
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
52
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
486-91; discussion 492
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Brachytherapy,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Reconstructive Surgical Procedures,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Sarcoma,
pubmed-meshheading:15096934-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection in the setting of brachytherapy: a 10-year experience.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|