pubmed-article:1333800 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0376387 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0018823 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034604 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0488736 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0428781 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0039807 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0079809 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:issue | 6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1993-1-12 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:abstractText | A reliable, convenient measure of right ventricular ejection fraction may be a useful adjunct to evaluate cardiac allograft rejection. The purpose of this investigation was to compare two measures of right ventricular ejection fraction: (1) radionuclide angiography with the first-pass technique and (2) thermodilution with a balloon flotation catheter. The study was performed in 26 heart transplant recipients; hemodynamics, thermodilution cardiac output, and right ventricular ejection fraction were measured. First pass radionuclide angiography was performed either simultaneously (n = 11) or within 4 hours (n = 15) of the thermodilution study. Mean thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction was 39% +/- 8%, and radionuclide angiography ejection fraction was 47% +/- 9%, which represents a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in techniques. Linear regression showed no correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.3; p = NS). No differences in results were observed in those studied simultaneously versus less than 4 hours. We conclude that the thermodilution technique underestimates right ventricular ejection fraction in heart transplant recipients and that its usefulness as a tool to screen for systolic dysfunction related to rejection is limited. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:issn | 1053-2498 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HaasG JGJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BinkleyP FPF | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StarlingR CRC | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HattonP SPS | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Wooding-Scott... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:volume | 11 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:pagination | 1140-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1333800-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:articleTitle | Thermodilution measures of right ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart transplant recipients: a comparison with radionuclide angiography. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1333800 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1333800 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1333800 | lld:pubmed |