Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1997-2-26
pubmed:abstractText
In a prospective, randomized study, 47 patients underwent arthroscopic evaluation of the knee in an operating room setting with both a standard rod-lens arthroscope and a newer flexible optical catheter fiberoptic system. The goal of the study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the newer catheter system, which is recommended for use in the office setting. Forty-four patients were included in the data analysis, three were eliminated because we were unable to perform an adequate examination with the catheter scope secondary to intraarticular adhesions or excessive bleeding. A comparison of the two systems revealed an overall underestimation and underrecognition of intraarticular knee pathologic changes. Anterior cruciate ligament tears were missed in 3 of 21 knees; no posterior cruciate ligament tears were detected by the rod-lens arthroscope in 44 knees, but one false-positive result was "seen" using the optical catheter device. Similar trends in diagnosis (sensitivity, 25% to 67%; specificity, 96% to 99%) were seen for tears of the medial and lateral menisci, chondral lesions, and the identification of loose bodies. We conclude from the results of this study that the use of the optical catheter system for arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of the knee in the office setting may result in a significant compromise in visual acuity, resulting in missed and incorrect diagnoses.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0363-5465
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
24
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
819-23
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of an optical catheter office arthroscope with a standard rigid rod-lens arthroscope in the evaluation of the knee.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville 32607, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial