Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8687987rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0330386lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8687987lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043217lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8687987lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014406lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8687987lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033086lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:dateCreated1996-11-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:abstractTextEnvironmental concentrations and biological effects of certain metals and organic compounds found in wood preservatives were examined. The study focused on leachates from private residential docks in South Carolina tidal creeks. Copper, chromium, arsenic, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were measured in composite samples of surficial sediments and naturally occurring oyster populations (Crassostrea virginica) from creeks with high densities of docks, and from nearby reference creeks with no docks. In some cases, metal concentrations in sediments and oysters were higher immediately adjacent to dock pilings than they were elsewhere in the same creek. Sediments from most sites had concentrations of metals and total PAHs which were below levels reported to cause biological effects, however. Solid-phase Microtox(R) bioassays using whole sediments and rotifer bioassays using sediment pore water showed no significant differences in acute toxicity between creeks with and without docks. Oysters growing directly on dock pilings had significantly higher concentrations of copper than oysters growing at least 10 m away; however, there was no significant difference in the physiological condition of these oysters. Four-day field bioassays measuring percent survival of mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus), mud snails (Ilyanassa obsoleta), juvenile red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus), and juvenile white shrimp (Penaeus setiferus) showed no significant differences between sites near to and distant from newly constructed docks. Hatchery-reared oysters showed no significant differences between dock and reference sites in percent survival, growth, or bioaccumulation of metals after six weeks of exposure. The results suggest that, in estuarine environments with a moderate tidal range (1.5-2.0 m), wood preservative leachates from dock pilings have no acutely toxic effects on four common estuarine species, nor do they affect the short-term survival or growth of juvenile oysters.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:issn0090-4341lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MathewsT DTDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CHARD FDFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WendtP HPHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van DolahR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LevisenM VMVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:volume31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:pagination24-37lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8687987-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:articleTitleWood preservative leachates from docks in an estuarine environment.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:affiliationMarine Resources Division, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 12559, Charleston, South Carolina 29422, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8687987pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed