Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1996-1-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Monocyte procoagulant activity is mainly due to tissue factor (TF) expression, but functional assays may not be sufficiently accurate in clinical use, making useful a determination of TF antigen level. The aim of this study was to compare the results of one functional and three immunological TF assays (ELISA, immunocytochemical staining on slides and flow immuno cytometric analysis), in normal monocytes, after standardized stimulation by endotoxin. TF expression was determined in blood mononuclear cells isolated by gradient centrifugation and cultured, with or without various concentrations of endotoxin. On lysed cells, TF activity was determined by amidolytic assay and TF antigen level was determined, after triton extraction, by ELISA (Imubind, American Diagnostica). Mouse monoclonal antibody against TF (4508, American Diagnostica) was used for 1) immunocytochemical (ICC) staining on cytocentrifuge slides (Avidine-Biotine-peroxidase-Complex revelation) and 2) flow cytometric analysis using indirect labeling (Fab'2 Fluoresceine Isothyocyanate revelation). The determination of TF activity and TF antigen by ELISA method were equally sensitive to low concentration of endotoxin (0.005 EU/ml) and well correlated in the presence of higher concentrations of endotoxin. ICC led to a qualitative detection with a similar sensitivity to endotoxin stimulation. Flow cytometric analysis was poorly sensitive to increasing stimulation of monocytes. Of note, the functional, ELISA and immunocytochemical assays for monocyte TF expression were sensitive to endotoxin concentrations as low as 0.005 EU/ml.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
pubmed:issn |
0049-3848
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
pubmed:volume |
79
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
65-72
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Artifacts,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Cells, Cultured,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Chromogenic Compounds,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Colorimetry,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Endotoxins,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Equipment Contamination,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Flow Cytometry,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Fluorescent Antibody Technique,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Immunoenzyme Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Monocytes,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:7495105-Thromboplastin
|
pubmed:year |
1995
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Detection of monocyte tissue factor after endotoxin stimulation: comparison of one functional and three immunological methods.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Hôpital Cardiologique, Lille, France.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|