Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
10
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1982-1-28
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Four recently introduced low-capacity fixed performance oxygen therapy masks have been compared with the established Ventimask design. Under conditions of varying peak inspiratory flow rate the low-capacity devices all permit a variable amount of air admixture with a consequent fall in the inspired oxygen concentration. It is concluded that low-capacity venturi masks are not true fixed performance devices under all circumstances. The Ventimasks satisfy their specifications under all test conditions. A case is made for more rigorous assessment of new so-called "fixed performance" oxygen therapy devices before marketing is permitted.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Oct
|
| pubmed:issn |
0003-2409
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
36
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
958-64
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1981
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Fixed performance oxygen masks. Hypoxic hazard of low-capacity drugs.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|