Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6427237rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0373440lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007818lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004048lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0678257lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0428714lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0549178lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511237lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705509lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1550436lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:dateCreated1984-6-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:abstractTextThis article describes a rapid method for the regional measurement of cerebral blood flow using a single breath of C15O2 and positron emission tomography. The technique is based on the bolus distribution principle and utilises a reference table for the calculation of flow. Seven subjects were studied using both this method and the C15O2 continuous inhalation steady-state technique. The single-breath method gave flow values 20% higher than those obtained using the steady-state method. A simulation study was performed in an attempt to define the reasons for the difference between the two techniques. Estimations were made of identified sources of error in the measurement of regional cerebral blood flow using the single-breath technique and compared with results from a similar study previously described for the steady-state technique. However, further comparative studies will be necessary to satisfactorily explain the difference between both techniques.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:issn0271-678Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GibbsJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClarkJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KannoIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeatherJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RhodesC GCGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LammertsmaA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:pagination224-34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6427237-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:articleTitleMeasurement of cerebral blood flow using bolus inhalation of C15O2 and positron emission tomography: description of the method and its comparison with the C15O2 continuous inhalation method.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6427237pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6427237lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6427237lld:pubmed