Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1985-5-8
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0003-4185
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
28
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
5-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Cholelithiasis,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Cholestasis,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Common Bile Duct,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:3885824-Ultrasonography
|
pubmed:year |
1985
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The diameter of the common bile duct determined by ultrasound and ERCP is not necessarily comparable.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|