Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:3352646rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3352646lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3352646lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450442lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3352646lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:dateCreated1988-5-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:abstractTextCultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to two neurotoxic organophosphates, either sarin (GBI, GBII) at 1.4 X 10(-3) M or soman (GD) at 1.1 and 2.2 X 10(-3) M for 1 h, grown and their metaphase chromosomes scored for sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE). No cytotoxicity was seen with either agent at any dose level tested. Since histograms of SCE per cell showed that they were non-symmetrically arrayed around the mean, the number of SCEs were analyzed by using the nonparametric tests, Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis. Agents GBI and GBII did not show any significant increase in SCE over baseline. On the other hand, GD demonstrated a statistically significant increase in SCE with and without metabolic activation. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) alone at 5 X 10(-3) M and cyclophosphamide (CP) at 10(-4) M in the presence of rat microsomes (S9) induced a 3- and 8-fold increase in SCE per cell, respectively.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:issn0027-5107lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoldmanMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DacreJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NassM KMKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KleinA KAKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:volume204lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:pagination649-54lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:3352646-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:year1988lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:articleTitleSCE induction in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) exposed to G agents.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:affiliationLaboratory for Energy-Related Health Research, University of California, Davis 95616.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:3352646pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:3352646lld:pubmed