Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-7-27
pubmed:abstractText
The effect of consanguinity on fetal growth and development was studied in 3700 consecutive births (live and stillborn); 26% of the total births were to consanguineous couples. Hindus had a higher frequency of consanguineous marriages, uncle-niece unions being the commonest type, whereas Moslems preferred first cousin marriages. The incidence of congenital malformations was 39.1/1000 births with a significantly higher incidence among the consanguineous group (8.01%) as against the nonconsanguineous group (2.42%) (p less than 0.001). The incidence of malformations was higher in the uncle-niece matings (9.34%) compared to the first cousin marriages (6.18%) (p less than 0.01). Malformations of major systems were significantly more frequent among the consanguineous couples, whereas malformations of the eyes, ears, and skin did not show any significant effect of consanguinity. Stillbirth rates were significantly higher in the consanguineous group, irrespective of the mother's socioeconomic status, and were higher in uncle-niece matings compared to first cousin and beyond first cousin unions in both the poor and middle/upper class. A significant decrease in the mean birth weight and head circumference of babies born to consanguineous parents was noted in both the poor and middle/upper socioeconomic class. The mean length was less in babies born to consanguineous parents belonging to the poor social class only.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-1015847, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-2930226, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-2989708, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-5296840, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-5501467, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-570260, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-572202, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-5957485, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-6862601, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-7068161, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-7365759, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-7450832, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/2359095-76826
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0022-2593
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
27
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
348-52
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1990
pubmed:articleTitle
Consanguinity and its effect on fetal growth and development: a south Indian study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pediatrics, JJM Medical College, Karnataka, India.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article