Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/21553704
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0009968,
umls-concept:C0010654,
umls-concept:C0014406,
umls-concept:C0019602,
umls-concept:C0025646,
umls-concept:C0029235,
umls-concept:C0030956,
umls-concept:C0243144,
umls-concept:C1167622,
umls-concept:C1705241,
umls-concept:C1705242,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1880371,
umls-concept:C2347946
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-5-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The N-terminal, extracellular regions of eukaryotic high affinity copper transport (Ctr) proteins vary in composition of the Cu(i) binding amino acids: methionine, histidine, and cysteine. To examine why certain amino acids are exploited over others in Ctrs from different organisms, the relative Cu(i) binding affinity and the dependence of binding on pH were examined for 3 peptides of the sequence MG(2)XG(2)MK, where X is either Met, His, or Cys. Cu(i) affinity was examined using an ascorbic acid oxidation assay, an electrospray ionization mass spectrometry technique, and spectrophotometric titration with a competitive Cu(i) chelator. The relative affinities of the peptides with Cu(i) reveal a trend whereby Cys > His > Met at pH 7.4 and Cys > Met > His at pH 4.5. Ligand geometry and metric parameters were determined with X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Susceptibility of the peptides to oxidation by hydrogen peroxide and copper-catalyzed oxidative conditions was evaluated by mass spectrometry. These results support hypotheses as to why certain Cu(i) binding amino acids are preferred over others in proteins expressed at different pH and exposed to oxidative environments. The results also have implications for interpreting site-directed mutagenesis studies aimed at identifying copper binding amino acids in copper trafficking proteins.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Copper,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Cysteine,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Histidine,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Methionine,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/chemical/Oligopeptides
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
1756-591X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
3
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
61-73
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Copper,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Cysteine,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Histidine,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Hydrogen-Ion Concentration,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Kinetics,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Methionine,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Oligopeptides,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Oxidation-Reduction,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization,
pubmed-meshheading:21553704-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
|
pubmed:year |
2011
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
A comparison of methionine, histidine and cysteine in copper(I)-binding peptides reveals differences relevant to copper uptake by organisms in diverse environments.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Chemistry, Duke University, P.O. Box 90346,Durham, NC 27708-0346, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|