Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
2011-4-11
pubmed:abstractText
Obstetrics and gynaecology have seen rapid growth in the development of new tests with research on these tests presented as diagnostic accuracy studies. To avoid errors in judgement it is important that the methodology of these studies is such that bias is minimised. Our objective was to determine the methodological quality of test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist and to assess sources of bias.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-10493205, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-10584742, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-10789670, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-11767953, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-11884248, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-12513043, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-14606960, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-14615004, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-15128009, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-15943861, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-15983072, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-16081147, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-16721110, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-17116906, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-17218850, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-18332385, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-18362381, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-18680570, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-18836883, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-19395992, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-9600488, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/21426545-9746022
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1472-6874
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
11
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
7
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-7-28
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2011
pubmed:articleTitle
Methodological quality of test accuracy studies included in systematic reviews in obstetrics and gynaecology: sources of bias.
pubmed:affiliation
School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Reproduction, Genes and Development), University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK. r.k.morris@bham.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Meta-Analysis