Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12 Suppl 1
pubmed:dateCreated
2010-12-27
pubmed:abstractText
A particular challenge for the healthcare provider and the patient is to choose among competing therapeutic approaches for a particular condition. Often, the relative benefits and risks of potential therapies are not uniformly available from the existing scientific information. Many have pointed to the need for more comparative effectiveness research (CER) to aide in these decisions. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a long history of conducting CER. The success of the VA CER program has been facilitated by several important aspects of scientific infrastructure related to (1) research question refinement, (2) study design, planning and coordination, (3) evidence synthesis, and (4) implementation research. In publications that had VA coauthors in 2 major medical journals, 25% of the published studies were classified as CER. The most frequent categories of study were pharmaceutical and behavioral interventions. In the future, the CER enterprise will move toward increased input from clinicians in research topic choice and enhanced consideration of other methodologies besides the randomized controlled trial.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1555-7162
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
123
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
e3-7
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2010
pubmed:articleTitle
The past, present, and future of comparative effectiveness research in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
pubmed:affiliation
Office of Research and Development, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia 20420, USA. Joel.Kupersmith@va.gov
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article