rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0002978,
umls-concept:C0237753,
umls-concept:C0453882,
umls-concept:C0598285,
umls-concept:C1441526,
umls-concept:C1514743,
umls-concept:C1522318,
umls-concept:C1523987,
umls-concept:C1552848,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1880157,
umls-concept:C2698651
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2011-1-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) possesses high accuracy to detect coronary artery disease (CAD), although studies have reported differences in diagnostic performance. Prior trials used different numbers of interpreters, and the optimal number to detect CAD is unknown.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1876-861X
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
© 2010 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
4
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
384-90
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Cardiology,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Coronary Angiography,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Coronary Artery Disease,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Multicenter Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Observer Variation,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Prevalence,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Radiology,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Risk Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:21030335-Tomography, X-Ray Computed
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
What is the optimal number of readers needed to achieve high diagnostic accuracy in coronary computed tomographic angiography? A comparison of alternate reader combinations.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College at New York Presbyterian Hospital, 520 East 70th Street New York, NY 10021, USA. tml9001@med.cornell.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Validation Studies
|