Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:20171093rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002607lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20171093lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750852lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20171093lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037592lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20171093lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042945lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20171093lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332293lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:dateCreated2010-3-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:abstractTextThe utilization of tannery sludge in agricultural areas can be an alternative for its disposal and recycling. Despite this procedure may cause the loss of nitrogen by ammonia volatilization, there is no information about this process in tropical soils. For two years a field experiment was carried out in Rolândia (Paraná State, Brazil), to evaluate the amount of NH(3) volatilization due to tannery sludge application on agricultural soil. The doses of total N applied varied from zero to 1200 kg ha(-1), maintained at the surface for 89 days, as usual in this region. The alkalinity of the tannery sludge used was equivalent to between 262 and 361 g CaCO(3) per kg. Michaelis-Menten equation was adequate to estimate NH(3)-N volatilization kinetics. The relation between total nitrogen applied as tannery sludge and the potentially volatilized NH(3)-N, calculated by the chemical-kinetics equation resulted in an average determination coefficient of 0.87 (P>0.01). In this period, the amount of volatilized NH(3) was more intense during the first 30 days; the time to reach half of the maximum NH(3) volatilization (K(m)) was 13 an 9 days for the first and second experiments, respectively. The total loss as ammonia in the whole period corresponded in average to 17.5% of the total N applied and to 35% of the NH(4)(+)-N present in the sludge. If tannery sludge is to be surface applied to supply N for crops, the amounts lost as NH(3) must be taken into consideration.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:issn1873-2976lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NogueiraM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SantosC ACAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndradeC ACAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SousaJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinezA VAVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CoscioneA RARlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NakataniA SASlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CantarellaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CardosoE J...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:copyrightInfo(c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:volume101lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:pagination4690-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:20171093...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:year2010lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:articleTitleAmmonia volatilization in soil treated with tannery sludge.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Departamento de Ciência do Solo, CEP 13418-900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:20171093pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed