|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-2-26
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
It is debated whether patients with melanoma who undergo lymphadenectomy after a positive sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy (SNB) have a better prognosis compared with patients who are treated for clinically evident disease.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0008-543X
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
|
pubmed:volume |
116
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
1201-9
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-10-13
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2010
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Early (sentinel lymph node biopsy-guided) versus delayed lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients with lymph node metastases : personal experience and literature meta-analysis.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|
