Linked Life Data

1995380

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1995380

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-3-27
pubmed:abstractText
Blood loss during normal delivery was measured in 37 primiparas and 25 multiparas who had no obstetric or medical complications and who underwent normal delivery in a teaching hospital following spontaneous onset of labour at term. Measured blood loss was significantly greater than the estimated volume of blood loss. In primigravidas, the mean ( +/- SE, standard error of the mean) estimated blood loss was 260 +/- 12 ml and the mean measured blood loss was 401 +/- 29 ml. In multiparas the mean estimated blood loss was 220 +/- 10 ml and the mean measured blood loss was 319 +/- 41 ml. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly lower (P less than 0.05) than the mean measured blood loss in both groups. The size of the discrepancy between measured and estimated blood loss was proportional to the measured blood loss. These findings show that visual estimation of blood loss was grossly inaccurate.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0301-2115
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
30
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
119-24
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Hong Kong.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study