Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/19151149
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0018270,
umls-concept:C0025344,
umls-concept:C0229961,
umls-concept:C0597198,
umls-concept:C0871261,
umls-concept:C1259819,
umls-concept:C1280500,
umls-concept:C1512523,
umls-concept:C1515075,
umls-concept:C1521970,
umls-concept:C1561960,
umls-concept:C1704632,
umls-concept:C1706817,
umls-concept:C1948053,
umls-concept:C2347804,
umls-concept:C2825032,
umls-concept:C2911692
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-4-17
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Sixty-four crossbred heifers (451 +/- 23 kg) were used in a 42-d feeding trial (4 pens per treatment in a randomized complete block design) to evaluate the influence of preslaughter zilpaterol hydrochloride withdrawal period on growth performance and carcass characteristics. Heifers were fed a diet based on steam-flaked corn (2.13 Mcal of NE(m)/kg). Treatments were 1) control, no zilpaterol supplementation; 2) zilpaterol supplementation for 30 d, drug withdrawn from the diet 3 d preslaughter (ZIL-3); 3) zilpaterol supplementation for 30 d, drug withdrawn 6 d preslaughter (ZIL-6), and 4) zilpaterol supplementation for 30 d, drug withdrawn 12 d preslaughter (ZIL-12). Zilpaterol was supplemented at the rate of 0.15 mg/kg of BW daily. Intake of DM averaged 9.2 +/- 0.26 kg/d and was not affected (P > or = 0.36) by treatment. Compared with control heifers, ZIL-3 increased (P < 0.01) carcass-adjusted ADG (59%), G:F (57%), apparent dietary NE(m) (31%), and decreased observed/expected DMI (25%). Treatment with ZIL-3 did not affect marbling score (P = 0.49) or backfat thickness (P = 0.17), but compared with the control group, increased HCW (3.6%, P = 0.03), carcass dressing percentage (3.2%, P = 0.02), LM area (6.3%, P = 0.05), and reduced trimmed fat (31%, P = 0.03). Prolonging the period of zilpaterol withdrawal preslaughter tended to decrease carcass-adjusted ADG (linear, P = 0.11), G:F (linear, P = 0.08), apparent dietary NE(m) (linear, P = 0.11), and carcass dressing percentage (linear, P = 0.11). We conclude that growth performance and carcass yield responses to zilpaterol supplementation are negatively affected by prolonging the period of zilpaterol withdrawal beyond 3 d (the required minimum withdrawal period according to label). Drug withdrawal period may be a relevant factor in explaining variation in performance response to zilpaterol supplementation in commercial feedlots.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
May
|
pubmed:issn |
1525-3163
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
87
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1759-63
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Animal Husbandry,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Body Composition,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Cattle,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Dietary Supplements,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Growth,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Random Allocation,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Time Factors,
pubmed-meshheading:19151149-Trimethylsilyl Compounds
|
pubmed:year |
2009
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Effects of preslaughter withdrawal period on response of feedlot heifers to zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation: growth performance and carcass characteristics.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, México 21100.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|