Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18950887rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004611lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043188lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012854lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000983lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185115lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880022lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332306lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0148405lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:dateCreated2008-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:abstractTextAcetic acid bacteria (AAB) are fastidious microorganisms with poor recovery in culture. Culture-independent methods are currently under examination. Good DNA extraction is a strict requirement of these methods. We compared five methods for extracting the DNA of AAB directly from wine and vinegar samples. Four matrices (white wine, red wine, superficial vinegar and submerged vinegar) contaminated with two AAB strains belonging to Acetobacter pasteurianus and Gluconacetobacter hansenii were assayed. To improve the yield and quality of the extracted DNA, a sample treatment (washing with polyvinyl pyrrolidone or NaCl) was also tested. DNA quality was measured by amplification of the 16S rRNA gene with conventional PCR. DNA recovery rate was assessed by real-time PCR. DNA amplification was always successful with the Wizard method though DNA recovery was poor. A CTAB-based method and NucleoSpin protocol extracted the highest DNA recoveries from wine and vinegar samples. Both of these methods require treatment to recover suitable DNA for amplification with maximum recovery. Both may therefore be good solutions for DNA extraction in wine and vinegar samples. DNA extraction of Ga hansenii was more effective than that of A. pasteurianus. The fastest and cheapest method we evaluated (the Thermal shock protocol) produced the worst results both for DNA amplification and DNA recovery.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:issn0168-1605lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MateoEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaiKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JaraCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuillamónJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TorijaM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:day10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:volume128lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:pagination336-41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18950887...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:articleTitleAnalysis of several methods for the extraction of high quality DNA from acetic acid bacteria in wine and vinegar for characterization by PCR-based methods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:affiliationOenological Biotechnology, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/Marcel.lí Domingo s/n, 43007 Tarragona, Spain.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18950887pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:18950887lld:pubmed