Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
6
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1991-10-9
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
We report psychophysical evidence for a categorical dichotomy in the perception of contrast. Observers were required to rate the contrast of sinusoidal gratings (2.3 c/d) with contrast varying over a given range relative to two standards. One standard was designated "high" contrast and the other was designated "low." There was a boundary effect: contrast judgment depended upon whether the tested ranges included 10-15% contrast and discrimination was sharpest at the boundary between 10 and 15% contrast. These results are consistent with the existence of two systems underlying perceived contrast; one primarily sensitive below 10%, and the other primarily sensitive above 15% contrast.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jun
|
| pubmed:issn |
0952-5238
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
6
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
587-92
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1991
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Evidence for two systems mediating perceived contrast.
|
| pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Medical School, City University of New York, NY 10029.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|