| pubmed-article:18619692 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0003507 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0860888 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2707190 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0200765 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0428817 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2009-6-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:abstractText | Thirty-three consecutive patients with aortic stenosis underwent a 16-row spiral CT scan. Aortic valve planimetry was performed using two methods: double-oblique reformation (DO) and 2D-curved multiplanar reconstruction using advanced vessel analysis software (VA). The mean aortic valve area determined by transthoracic echocardiography was 0.88+/-0.34 [0.53-1.88] and did not differ significantly from that determined by CT (DO): 0.87+/-0.38 [0.42-1.93] (p=0.75) or CT (VA): 0.87+/-0.38 [0.44-2.00] (p=0.69). This study demonstrates that 16-row spiral CT scan is a feasible, accurate and reproducible method for aortic valve planimetry in patients with aortic stenosis. Both methods show similar accuracy but the VA method takes slightly longer. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:month | Jun | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:issn | 1874-1754 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TribouilloyCh... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeborgneLaure... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ReyJean-LucJL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RemondAlexand... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RenardCédricC | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LevyFranckF | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChoplinYoannY | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ClaeysMathieu... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JarryGeneviév... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:QuiretJean-Cl... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:day | 26 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:volume | 135 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:pagination | 266-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18619692... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:year | 2009 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:articleTitle | Quantification of aortic valve area with ECG-gated multi-detector spiral computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis and comparison of two image analysis methods. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:publicationType | Letter | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:18619692 | pubmed:publicationType | Validation Studies | lld:pubmed |
