Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18445424
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-4-30
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This article describes a retrospective and descriptive study into the added value of ProMED-mail--the global electronic reporting system for outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases and toxins maintained by the International Society for Infectious Diseases--as an early warning system for The Netherlands Early Warning Committee (NEWC). Information about infectious disease events in foreign countries originating from ProMED-mail was retrieved from the reports of the NEWC between May 2006 and June 2007. Each event was analysed in depth in order to determine if it could have been a possible threat to public health in The Netherlands. It was determined whether these events were mentioned in other sources of information used by the NEWC besides ProMED-mail. In addition, we assessed the possible consequences of missing an event when not reading ProMED-mail or of being informed of the event with a time delay. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were conducted to explore other functions of ProMED-mail besides early warning. Five out of 25 events reported in ProMED-mail were assessed as a potential threat to The Netherlands, mainly because of the known vulnerability of The Netherlands for vaccine preventable diseases: an outbreak of measles in the United Kingdom and Japan, a case of poliomyelitis in Kenya, and two events concerning Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1. The outbreak of measles in Japan and one case of HPAI H5N1 infection in a bird in Germany were only reported by ProMED-mail; the other potential threats were mentioned in other sources with a time delay. ProMED-mail has a limited but real added value over other sources in the early warning of threats. A more specific approach of using ProMED-mail by defining vulnerabilities of a country would be useful and efficient. ProMED-mail is appreciated for providing background and preliminary outbreak information.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
1560-7917
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:day |
7
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Disease Notification,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Disease Outbreaks,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Electronic Mail,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-International Cooperation,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Internet,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Netherlands,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Population Surveillance,
pubmed-meshheading:18445424-Registries
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The value of ProMED-mail for the Early Warning Committee in the Netherlands: more specific approach recommended.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|