Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17524728
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-6-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The most common methods for discovery of chemical compounds capable of manipulating biological function involves some form of screening. The success of such screens is highly dependent on the chemical materials - commonly referred to as libraries - that are assayed. Classic methods for the design of screening libraries have depended on knowledge of target structure and relevant pharmacophores for target focus, and on simple count-based measures to assess other properties. The recent proliferation of two novel screening paradigms, structure-based screening and high-content screening, prompts a profound rethink about the ideal composition of small-molecule screening libraries. We suggest that currently utilized libraries are not optimal for addressing new targets by high-throughput screening, or complex phenotypes by high-content screening.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1367-5931
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
11
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
244-51
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-8-25
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The interdependence between screening methods and screening libraries.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38103, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|