|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-2-28
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Quality of care measured by adverse events cannot address errors of process that have no adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine whether process could be used to assess quality of care and whether process analysis could be used to assess interventions designed to improve quality.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0007-1323
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
(c) 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
94
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
376-81
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Measurement of process as quality control in the management of acute surgical emergencies.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|
