Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17106312rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031831lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085089lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005823lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443199lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680218lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2347947lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1561560lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1561561lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1547135lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1547139lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439841lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:dateCreated2006-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:abstractTextAmbulatory blood pressure is a better predictor of target organ damage and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events than office measurements. Whether this is due to the greater reliability owing to the larger number of measurements that are usually taken using ambulatory monitoring, or the greater validity of these measurements independent of the number, remains controversial.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:issn1359-5237lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShimboDaichiDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DevereuxRicha...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PickeringThom...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchwartzJosep...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GerinWilliamWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaplinWillia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OgedegbeGbeng...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RieckmannNina...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BurgMatthewMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoyalTanyaTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AbrahamDennis...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JhulaniJuheeJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:pagination297-301lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:dateRevised2007-12-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17106312...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:articleTitleSuperiority of ambulatory to physician blood pressure is not an artifact of differential measurement reliability.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA. wg131@columbia.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17106312pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramurallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:17106312lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:17106312lld:pubmed