Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16812155
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-6-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Response rate and the proportion of time pigeons allocated to a key-pecking activity were measured on several basic types of reinforcement schedules. Reinforcement frequency was varied within each type of basic schedule, and the effects on two constituents of response rate were noted. Propensity, the proportion of time the birds spent on a platform in front of the key, showed very consistent effects as reinforcement frequency varied: in general, it decreased when reinforcement frequency markedly decreased and it increased when reinforcement frequency increased. Speed, key pecks per unit of time spent on the platform, showed inconsistent effects when reinforcement frequency varied. Consequently, response rate showed less consistent effects than did propensity. Cumulative response records demonstrated the existence of several different types of transitions or boundary states between the key-pecking activity and other activities. The types of transitions that occurred between activities depended on both the type of reinforcement schedule and the frequency of reinforcement. The propensity data support the position that general laws of behavior can be based on temporal measures of behavior. The speed data suggest that, if a complete assessment of the dynamic properties of behavior is to be achieved, measures of behavior must incorporate the structural variations in the operant unit.
|
| pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-13591455,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-13877307,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-14019312,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811225,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811236,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811315,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811392,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811415,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811504,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811646,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811782,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811829,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811901,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-16811968,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-5636852,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812155-5672248
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Nov
|
| pubmed:issn |
0022-5002
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
32
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
341-62
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-14
|
| pubmed:year |
1979
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Constituents of response rates.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|