Linked Life Data

16700155

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16700155

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-5-16
pubmed:abstractText
Three different approaches for the estimation of uncertainty measurements using the same analytical method were compared, namely validation, robustness and inter-laboratory studies. The uncertainty obtained with the robustness study! predicted well the uncertainty of the inter-laboratory study. On the other hand, the uncertainty estimation obtained with the validation study is lower than those obtained with the two other approaches but is still acceptable as long as the analytical method will be used in a single laboratory.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0567-7386
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
60-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
[Comparison of three approaches for uncertainty estimation].
pubmed:affiliation
Laboratoire de Chimie Analytique, Institut de Pharmacie, Université de Liège, CHU, B36, B-4000 Liège, Belgique.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract