Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-1-24
pubmed:abstractText
During the past 5 years, 19 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 11 meta-analyses that explored the role of acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy have been published. Herein, we summarize this literature and demonstrate that these 34 empirical studies have not yet conclusively resolved this research question. We use the evidence on acetylcysteine as a case study of how research evidence accumulates and consider whether an alternative approach to investigating the question of acetylcysteine's efficacy could have resulted in a more definitive conclusion. We consider the broader lessons learned from this acetylcysteine case study for the medical and research communities and propose specific steps that could be taken to improve the future coordination of research activity to ultimately yield more meaningful and definitive evidence on important clinical questions.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0003-9926
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
23
pubmed:volume
166
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
161-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Meta-Analysis