Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16310429rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522564lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0948089lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013518lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514983lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:dateCreated2005-11-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:abstractTextWe examined the hypothesis that myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is superior to conventional electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and troponin I criteria for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. We prospectively enrolled 114 consecutive patients (60+/-10 years of age, 73 men) who presented to the emergency room with chest pain on exertion and at rest. Exclusion criteria included an age<40 years, presence of Q wave or ST-segment elevation, and a poor echocardiographic window. Echocardiography and MCE were performed to assess regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) and myocardial perfusion defects by using continuous infusion of perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. Acute coronary syndrome was confirmed in 87 patients. There were no deaths; 46 patients had acute myocardial infarction, and 41 patients required urgent revascularization. On multiple logistic regression analysis, myocardial perfusion defect (odd ratio 87, p<0.001) was the only independent variable for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome. Myocardial perfusion defect (odd ratio 21, p=0.001) and troponin I levels (odd ratio 3, p=0.009) were independent predictors for acute myocardial infarction. The sensitivity of myocardial perfusion defect for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome was 77%, which is significantly higher than the sensitivities of ST change, troponin I increase, and RWMA (28%, 34%, and 49%, respectively), with similar specificities of 85% to 96%. In conclusion, MCE is more sensitive than the currently used electrocardiographic and troponin I criteria, and evaluation of myocardial perfusion defect by MCE complements RWMA analysis by conventional echocardiography for accurate diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HongMyeong-Ki...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ParkSeong-Woo...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ParkSeung-Jun...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SongJong-MinJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KangDuk-HyunD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SongJae-KwanJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KangSoo-JinSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChoiKee-JunKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:volume96lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:pagination1498-502lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16310429...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:articleTitleEfficacy of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the diagnosis and risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:affiliationThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea. dhkang@amc.seoul.krlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16310429pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16310429lld:pubmed